Measure Schmeasure — Practical Ways to Focus on What CountsIn a world awash with dashboards, KPIs, and endless streams of analytics, it’s easy to confuse measurement with meaning. “Measure Schmeasure” isn’t an argument against measurement itself — numbers can illuminate patterns, track progress, and signal problems — but it is a cautionary phrase reminding teams and leaders to treat metrics as tools, not truths. This article explores practical ways to focus on what really counts: outcomes, learning, and long-term value.
Why metrics mislead: common traps
Many organizations fall into measurement traps that distort priorities:
- Short-termism: Chasing metrics that show immediate gains (pageviews, downloads, quarterly revenue spikes) at the cost of sustainable growth.
- Vanity metrics: Counting what’s easy to measure rather than what matters (e.g., follower counts without engagement).
- KPI overload: Tracking too many indicators dilutes focus and hides the few signals that actually predict success.
- Misaligned incentives: Incentives tied to narrow metrics encourage gaming the system.
- Causation confusion: Mistaking correlation for causation leads to misguided decisions.
Recognizing these traps is the first step toward meaningful measurement.
Start with outcomes, not outputs
A straightforward way to shift from “measure schmeasure” to meaningful metrics is to orient measurement around outcomes — the real-world effects you want to create — rather than outputs, the activities you perform.
- Outputs: number of emails sent, features released, posts published.
- Outcomes: customer retention, time saved for users, increased conversion from trial to paid.
To implement:
- Define the desired outcome clearly and in plain language.
- Ask: which measurable signal best reflects this outcome?
- Use outputs only as leading indicators or operational metrics, not as the primary goal.
Example: If the outcome is “users succeed using our product,” a useful metric might be task completion rates or net retention, rather than raw sign-ups.
Use fewer, better metrics
Less is more. Adopt a small set (3–7) of metrics that together provide a balanced view of progress. Each metric should be:
- Actionable — leaders and teams can influence it.
- Predictive — it forecasts future success.
- Understandable — everyone knows what it means and why it matters.
A simple balanced set for a SaaS product might include:
- Activation rate (early usage that predicts retention)
- Net revenue retention (growth from existing customers)
- Customer satisfaction or NPS (qualitative success signal)
- Time to value (how quickly users see benefit)
Create a single-page metrics dashboard and review it weekly or monthly. Remove or replace metrics that consistently fail the actionable/predictive/understandable test.
Combine quantitative and qualitative data
Numbers tell you what, stories tell you why. When a metric moves, pair it with qualitative investigation:
- Customer interviews to understand behavior and motivation.
- Session recordings or usability testing to see friction points.
- Support ticket analysis to find recurring issues.
Example: If churn increases, don’t just tweak the onboarding email — talk to customers who left, observe their use, and map the friction that led them away.
Measure leading and lagging indicators
Lagging indicators (revenue, churn) confirm whether strategies worked; leading indicators (activation, engagement) provide early warning and opportunities to iterate.
- Identify leading metrics that historically correlate with your lagging outcomes.
- Treat them as experiments: adjust product or marketing tactics and observe leading metrics to predict future impact.
Frame metrics as hypotheses to be tested
Metrics should guide experiments, not justify status quo actions. Treat a chosen metric as a hypothesis: “If we improve X, then Y will happen.” Use A/B testing, pilot programs, and controlled changes to validate.
- Formulate clear hypotheses with success criteria.
- Run small, rapid experiments.
- Use statistical significance appropriately — avoid overinterpreting noisy data.
Align incentives and culture
If people are rewarded for hitting narrow metrics, they will optimize for them — sometimes at the expense of customers or long-term health.
- Design incentives that reward durable outcomes (customer lifetime value, product quality).
- Celebrate learning and course-corrections, not just metric wins.
- Encourage cross-functional ownership of key metrics to avoid siloed optimization.
Beware of perverse effects and gaming
When measurement becomes everything, gaming behavior emerges. Examples:
- Support teams closing tickets prematurely to reduce open ticket counts.
- Growth teams buying low-quality traffic to inflate acquisition numbers.
Mitigate gaming by:
- Using complementary metrics (quality + quantity).
- Auditing data and processes regularly.
- Rotating or re-evaluating metrics to reduce entrenched manipulation.
Invest in data hygiene and interpretation
Bad data produces bad decisions. Prioritize:
- Reliable instrumentation and consistent event definitions.
- Clear documentation for each metric: definition, calculation, owner, and known limitations.
- Regular data quality checks and alerts for anomalies.
Interpretation matters: always ask whether a metric change reflects real user behavior or an artifact (tracking errors, seasonality, or one-off campaigns).
Practical framework: Measure — Learn — Act
Adopt a cyclical framework to keep measurement purposeful.
- Measure: Choose a small set of metrics tied to outcomes and collect baseline data.
- Learn: Combine quantitative trends with qualitative insights to form hypotheses.
- Act: Run experiments or changes aimed at the hypothesized drivers.
- Review: Evaluate outcomes, update metrics/hypotheses, and repeat.
This keeps measurement dynamic and focused on improvement rather than vanity.
Case studies (brief)
- Product onboarding: A team replaced “number of tutorial views” with “first-week task completion.” After redesigning onboarding and running A/B tests, activation rose 18%, and 6-month retention improved.
- Support quality: Instead of measuring closed tickets per agent, a company tracked “issues resolved without repeat contact.” This reduced premature closures and increased customer satisfaction.
- Marketing funnel: Rather than optimizing for click-throughs, a campaign measured “trial-to-paid conversion from referred traffic” and shifted budget to channels yielding higher LTV.
Tools and practices to adopt
- Single-source dashboards: One canonical dashboard with definitions linked to source data.
- Experimentation platform: For A/B tests and feature flags.
- Regular metric post-mortems: When a metric deviates, run a short analysis ritual (what changed, why, next steps).
- Customer research cadence: Scheduled interviews and usability sessions tied to metric changes.
Final checklist: Are you focusing on what counts?
- Do your metrics map to clear outcomes?
- Are they actionable, predictive, and understandable?
- Do you mix quantitative signals with qualitative insight?
- Are incentives aligned with long-term value?
- Do you treat metrics as hypotheses and test changes?
- Is your data trustworthy and well-documented?
If you answered “no” to any, you likely need to move beyond “measure schmeasure” toward measurement that actually matters.
Measure with purpose: metrics are compasses, not commandments. Use them to navigate toward real outcomes, but don’t confuse the map for the territory.
Leave a Reply